In vivo ameliorative effects of vitamin E against hydralazine-induced lupus.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the in vivo ameliorative effects of vitamin E in a hydralazine-induced lupus model, which closely resembles SLE in humans. We aim to shed light on its potential as a therapeutic agent for managing SLE. METHODS: Forty BALB/c mice were used in this study. Hydralazine hydrochloride was orally administered in a concentration of 25 mg/kg to the five mice groups once weekly for a period of 5 weeks to induce a lupus-like condition. The untreated group was the normal control group. To confirm the development of lupus, an ANA test was conducted. After the mice tested positive for ANA, drug treatments commenced. The negative control group did not receive any drug treatment. The treatments included prednisolone, methotrexate and vitamin E, all administered at a concentration of 25 mg/kg, with a higher dose of vitamin E (50 mg/kg) also administered. RESULTS: Notably, on day 35, after drug treatment, we observed that mice that received vitamin E at a dosage of 50 mg/kg (3.01±0.100) had a slight decrease in lymphocyte hydrogen peroxide radicals when compared with the group receiving 25 mg/kg of vitamin E (3.30±0.100) (p<0.05). This finding suggests that the scavenging potential of vitamin E is dose dependent. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that vitamin E supplementation, especially at a higher dose (50 mg/kg), holds promise in ameliorating lupus-like conditions. These findings warrant further exploration and may offer a potential avenue for improving the disease status of patients experiencing SLE.

Treatment of acute-onset hypertension in pregnancy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-hypertensives and route of administration.

BACKGROUND: Consensus on the relative efficacy of available antihypertensive agents used in pregnancy is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment success with antihypertensives and categorize by route of administration. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched without date restriction. DATA COLLECTION: Peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacologic agents used to treat hypertension in parturients were included. Evaluated treatment groups included IV-labetalol (BBIV), IV-hydralazine (DIV), oral-nifedipine (CCBPO), sublingual nifedipine (CCBSL), IV-calcium channel blocker (nonspecific)(CCBIV), IV-nitroglycerine (NTG), epoprostenol infusion (PRO), IV-ketanserin (5HT2B), IV-diazoxide (BZO), oral-nifedipine + methyldopa (CCBAG), oral-methyl-dopa (AAG), and oral prazosin (ABPO). ANALYSIS: Seventy-four studies (8324 patients) were eligible post PRISMA guidelines screening. Results were pooled using a Bayesian-approach for success of treatment (study defined target blood pressure), time to achieve target pressure, and neonatal intensive-care admissions. RESULTS: Treatment success (primary outcome, 55 trials with 5518 patients) was analyzed. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was categorized for 13 drugs, CCBPO (0.84) followed by CCBSL (0.78) were most likely to be effective in achieving target blood pressure. After sub-grouping by presence/absence of preeclampsia, CCB-PO ranked highest for both [(0.82) vs. (0.77), respectively]. Serotonin antagonists (0.99) and nitroglycerin (0.88) ranked highest for time to target pressure. NICU admissions were lowest for alpha-2 agonists (0.89), followed by BB PO (0.82) and hydralazine IV (0.49). CONCLUSION: Oral calcium-channel blockers ranked highest for treatment success. Ketanserin achieved target blood pressure fastest, warranting additional research. The results should be interpreted with caution as SUCRA values may not indicate whether the differences between interventions have clinically meaningful effect sizes.

Race/ethnicity differences in response to acute antihypertensive treatment of peripartum severe hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increase maternal morbidity, mortality, and long-term risk for cardiovascular disease. The rising incidence of chronic hypertension and preeclampsia disproportionately affects people of color. There is a paucity of published data examining differences in the effectiveness of acute antihypertensive agents between pregnant patients of different races/ethnicities. We aimed to determine if the effectiveness of acute antihypertensive agents for peripartum severe hypertension differs by race/ethnicity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with severe peripartum hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg confirmed within 15 min) to determine whether the effectiveness of blood pressure control using nationally recommended medications (hydralazine, labetalol, nifedipine) differed by race/ethnicity. The primary outcome was reduction and maintenance of blood pressure to target ranges (140-150/90-100 mm Hg or below) for ≥4 h in each race/ethnicity group. Statistical tests included χ2, Fisher's exact, analysis of variance, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 729 patients receiving treatment for severe peripartum hypertension, all medications were effective (overall 86.4% efficacy) at controlling blood pressure. Labetalol was the most effective medication in White patients (93.0 vs. 74.7% for nifedipine and 86.5% for hydralazine, p < .001). No overall differences in medication effectiveness were found in Black, Asian, or LatinX patients. Black and Asian patients were more likely to experience >1 hypertensive episode [51.0 and 49.0%, respectively vs. 35.4% (White) and 40.0% (LatinX), p = .008]. CONCLUSION: Currently recommended therapies for severe peripartum hypertension are effective in controlling blood pressure for ≥4 h in patients of all race/ethnic groups. Labetalol was the most effective medication in White patients with no overall differences in medication effectiveness in Black, Asian, or LatinX patients.

Different dosage regimens of nifedipine, labetalol, and hydralazine for the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) hydralazine, oral nifedipine, and IV labetalol with different dosage regimens in the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effects of hydralazine, nifedipine, and labetalol in the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs with 2183 patients comparing 7 regimens (oral nifedipine 50,60,90 mg; hydralazine 15,25 mg; and labetalol 220,300 mg) were identified. Compared with IV labetalol 300 mg, nifedipine 50,60, and 90 mg significantly improved the successful treatment rate of severe hypertension during pregnancy, nifedipine 50 and 90 mg and IV hydralazine 25 mg required significantly fewer doses to achieve target blood pressure (BP), and nifedipine 50 mg took significantly shorter time to achieve target BP. Subgroup analysis showed that only nifedipine 50 mg tablets, not capsules, required a significantly shorter time and fewer doses to achieve target BP than IV labetalol 300 mg. Moreover, nifedipine 60,90 mg showed superior effectiveness than IV hydralazine 15,25 mg in the successful treatment rate of severe hypertension during pregnancy. SUCRA analysis suggested that nifedipine 50,60,90 mg as the better regimens with the lower rates of overall ADR and neonatal complications. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrated the superiority of oral nifedipine 50,60,90 mg, especially oral nifedipine 50 mg tablets, in the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy than IV labetalol 300 mg, while oral nifedipine 60,90 mg also showed superiority in the successful treatment rate of severe hypertension during pregnancy than IV hydralazine 15,25 mg. However, the limitations of the underlying data indicate that future large-scale and rigorous RCTs are needed to confirm such findings.

Hydralazine augmented ultrasound hyperthermia for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

This study investigates the use of hydralazine to enhance ultrasound hyperthermia for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by minimizing flow-mediated heat loss from the tumor. Murine HCC tumors were treated with a continuous mode ultrasound with or without an intravenous administration of hydralazine (5 mg/kg). Tumor blood flow and blood vessels were evaluated by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and histology, respectively. Hydralazine markedly enhanced ultrasound hyperthermia through the disruption of tumor blood flow in HCC. Ultrasound treatment with hydralazine significantly reduced peak enhancement (PE), perfusion index (PI), and area under the curve (AUC) of the CEUS time-intensity curves by 91.9 ± 0.9%, 95.7 ± 0.7%, and 96.6 ± 0.5%, compared to 71.4 ± 1.9%, 84.7 ± 1.1%, and 85.6 ± 0.7% respectively without hydralazine. Tumor temperature measurements showed that the cumulative thermal dose delivered by ultrasound treatment with hydralazine (170.8 ± 11.8 min) was significantly higher than that without hydralazine (137.7 ± 10.7 min). Histological assessment of the ultrasound-treated tumors showed that hydralazine injection formed larger hemorrhagic pools and increased tumor vessel dilation consistent with CEUS observations illustrating the augmentation of hyperthermic effects by hydralazine. In conclusion, we demonstrated that ultrasound hyperthermia can be enhanced significantly by hydralazine in murine HCC tumors by modulating tumor blood flow. Future studies demonstrating the safety of the combined use of ultrasound and hydralazine would enable the clinical translation of the proposed technique.

Identification of factors associated with delayed treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergencies.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric hypertensive emergency is defined as having systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg, confirmed 15 minutes apart. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that acute-onset, severe hypertension be treated with first line-therapy (intravenous labetalol, intravenous hydralazine or oral nifedipine) within 60 minutes to reduce risk of maternal morbidity and death. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify barriers that lead to delayed treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergency. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed that compared women who were treated appropriately within 60 minutes vs those with delay in first-line therapy. We identified 604 patients with discharge diagnoses of chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, or preeclampsia using International Classification of Diseases-10 codes and obstetric antihypertensive usage in a pharmacy database at 1 academic institution from January 2017 through June 2018. Of these, 267 women (44.2%) experienced obstetric hypertensive emergency in the intrapartum period or within 2 days of delivery; the results from 213 women were used for analysis. We evaluated maternal characteristics, presenting symptoms and circumstances, timing of hypertensive emergency, gestational age at presentation, and administered medications. Chi square, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and sample t-tests were used to compare the 2 groups. Univariable logistic regression was applied to determine predictors of delayed treatment. Multivariable regression model was also performed; C-statistic and Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to assess the model fit. A result was considered statistically significant at P<.05. RESULTS: Of the 213 women, 110 (51.6%) had delayed treatment vs 103 (48.4%) who were treated within 60 minutes. Patients who had delayed treatment were 3.2 times more likely to have an initial blood pressure in the nonsevere range vs those who had timely treatment (odds ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-5.68). Timeliness of treatment was associated with presence or absence of preeclampsia symptoms; patients without preeclampsia symptoms were 2.7 times more likely to have delayed treatment (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-4.80). Patients with hypertensive emergencies that occurred overnight between 10 pm and 6 am were 2.7 times more likely to have delayed treatment vs those emergencies that occurred between 6 am and 10 pm (odds ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-5.83). Delayed treatment also had an association with race, with white patients being 1.8 times more likely to have delayed treatment (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.08). Patients who were treated at <60 minutes had a lower gestational age at presentation vs those with delayed treatment (34.6±5 vs 36.6±4 weeks, respectively; P<.001). For every 1-week increase in gestational age at presentation, there was a 9% increase in the likelihood of delayed treatment (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.19). Another factor that was associated with delay of treatment was having a complaint of labor symptoms, which made patients 2.2 times as likely to experience treatment delay (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.41). CONCLUSION: Initial blood pressure in the nonsevere range, absence of preeclampsia symptoms, presentation overnight, white race, having complaint of labor symptoms, and increasing gestational age at presentation are barriers that lead to a delay in the treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergency. Quality improvement initiatives that target these barriers should be instituted to improve timely treatment.

Focused Update on Pharmacologic Management of Hypertensive Emergencies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertensive emergency is defined as a systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure > 120 mmHg with evidence of new or progressive end-organ damage. The purpose of this paper is to review advances in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies within the last 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: New literature and recommendations for managing hypertensive emergencies in the setting of pregnancy, stroke, and heart failure have been published. Oral nifedipine is now considered an alternative first-line therapy, along with intravenous hydralazine and labetalol for women presenting with pre-eclampsia. Clevidipine is now endorsed by guidelines as a first-line treatment option for blood pressure reduction in acute ischemic stroke and may be considered for use in intracranial hemorrhage. Treatment of hypertensive heart failure remains challenging; clevidipine and enalaprilat can be considered for use in this population although data supporting their use remains limited.

Hydralazine vs nifedipine for acute hypertensive emergency in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of good quality evidence regarding the best therapeutic option for acute control of blood pressure during acute hypertensive emergency of pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy of intravenously administered hydralazine and oral nifedipine for acute blood pressure control in acute hypertensive emergency of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, pregnant women (≥24 weeks period of gestation) with sustained increase in systolic blood pressure of ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of ≥110 mm Hg were randomized to receive intravenous hydralazine injection in doses of 5, 10, 10, and 10 mg and a placebo tablet or oral nifedipine (10 mg tablet up to 4 doses) and intravenous saline injection every 20 minutes until the target blood pressure of 150 mm Hg systolic and ≤100 mm Hg diastolic was achieved. Crossover treatment was administered if the initial treatment failed. The primary outcome of the study was time necessary to achieve target blood pressure. The secondary outcomes were the number of dosages required, adverse maternal and neonatal effects, and perinatal outcome. RESULTS: From December 2014 through September 2015, we enrolled 60 patients. The median time to achieve target blood pressure was 40 minutes in both groups (intravenous hydralazine and oral nifedipine) (interquartile interval 5 and 40 minutes, respectively, P = .809). The median dose requirement in both groups was 2 (intravenous hydralazine and oral nifedipine) (interquartile range 1 and 2 doses, respectively, P = .625). Intravenous hydralazine was associated with statistically significantly higher occurrence of vomiting (9/30 vs 2/30, respectively, P = .042). No serious adverse maternal or perinatal side effects were witnessed in either group. CONCLUSION: Both intravenous hydralazine and oral nifedipine are equally effective in lowering of blood pressure in acute hypertensive emergency of pregnancy.

Acrolein Scavenger Hydralazine Prevents Streptozotocin-Induced Painful Diabetic Neuropathy and Spinal Neuroinflammation in Rats.

Diabetes-induced neuropathic pain (DNP) substantially influences people's life qualities. Hyperglycemia-induced excess free radicals have been considered as the most critical mechanisms underlying DNP. As an unsaturated aldehyde and a reactive product of lipid peroxidation, acrolein plays critical roles in diabetic nephropathy and inflammatory pain. We sought to determine whether acrolein is involved in DNP in this study. Diabetes was induced by a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 60 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ). An acrolein scavenger hydralazine (5 mg/kg) was administered through a daily injection for 4 weeks, starting immediately within 30 min after STZ injection. Western blot showed that hydralazine could effectively inhibit STZ-induced upregulation of acrolein in the spinal dorsal horn on day 7-28 after STZ injection. Behavioral tests showed that STZ injection induced significant mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, which could be alleviated by hydralazine. Immunofluorescent histochemistry and Western blot showed that STZ induced significant microglial activation. ELISA data indicated upregulation of inflammatory cytokines IL-1ß and TNF-α expression in the spinal dorsal horn. Furthermore, hydralazine effectively attenuated microglial activation and expression of inflammatory mediators. Our data indicate that acrolein might be involved in the development of neuroinflammation and behavioral consequences of DNP. Anat Rec, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Anat Rec, 300:1858-1864, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Postpartum Hypertension: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

IMPORTANCE: Postpartum hypertension complicates approximately 2% of pregnancies and, similar to antepartum severe hypertension, can have devastating consequences including maternal death. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to increase the knowledge and skills of women's health care providers in understanding, diagnosing, and managing hypertension in the postpartum period. RESULTS: Hypertension complicating pregnancy, including postpartum, is defined as systolic blood pressure 140 mm Hg or greater and/or diastolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg or greater on 2 or more occasions at least 4 hours apart. Severe hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure 160 mm Hg or greater and/or diastolic blood pressure 110 mm Hg or greater on 2 or more occasions repeated at a short interval (minutes). Workup for secondary causes of hypertension should be pursued, especially in patients with severe or resistant hypertension, hypokalemia, abnormal creatinine, or a strong family history of renal disease. Because severe hypertension is known to cause maternal stroke, women with severe hypertension sustained over 15 minutes during pregnancy or in the postpartum period should be treated with fast-acting antihypertension medication. Labetalol, hydralazine, and nifedipine are all effective for acute management, although nifedipine may work the fastest. For persistent postpartum hypertension, a long-acting antihypertensive agent should be started. Labetalol and nifedipine are also both effective, but labetalol may achieve control at a lower dose with fewer adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Providers must be aware of the risks associated with postpartum hypertension and educate women about the symptoms of postpartum preeclampsia. Severe acute hypertension should be treated in a timely fashion to avoid morbidity and mortality. Women with persistent postpartum hypertension should be administered a long-acting antihypertensive agent. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completing this activity, the learner should be better able to assist patients and providers in identifying postpartum hypertension; provide a framework for the evaluation of new-onset postpartum hypertension; and provide instructions for the management of acute severe and persistent postpartum hypertension.

Therapeutic Effects of Procainamide on Endotoxin-Induced Rhabdomyolysis in Rats.

Overt systemic inflammatory response is a predisposing mechanism for infection-induced skeletal muscle damage and rhabdomyolysis. Aberrant DNA methylation plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of excessive inflammatory response. The antiarrhythmic drug procainamide is a non-nucleoside inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) used to alleviate DNA hypermethylation. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of procainamide on the syndromes and complications of rhabdomyolysis rats induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Rhabdomyolysis animal model was established by intravenous infusion of LPS (5 mg/kg) accompanied by procainamide therapy (50 mg/kg). During the experimental period, the changes of hemodynamics, muscle injury index, kidney function, blood gas, blood electrolytes, blood glucose, and plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were examined. Kidneys and lungs were exercised to analyze superoxide production, neutrophil infiltration, and DNMTs expression. The rats in this model showed similar clinical syndromes and complications of rhabdomyolysis including high levels of plasma creatine kinase, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, metabolic acidosis, hypotension, tachycardia, and hypoglycemia. The increases of lung DNMT1 expression and plasma IL-6 concentration were also observed in rhabdomyolysis animals induced by LPS. Treatment with procainamide not only inhibited the overexpression of DNMT1 but also diminished the overproduction of IL-6 in rhabdomyolysis rats. In addition, procainamide improved muscle damage, renal dysfunction, electrolytes disturbance, metabolic acidosis, hypotension, and hypoglycemia in the rats with rhabdomyolysis. Moreover, another DNMT inhibitor hydralazine mitigated hypoglycemia, muscle damage, and renal dysfunction in rhabdomyolysis rats. These findings reveal that therapeutic effects of procainamide could be based on the suppression of DNMT1 and pro-inflammatory cytokine in endotoxin-induced rhabdomyolysis.

Hypertensive Emergencies in Pregnancy.

The prevalence of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy is increasing. The etiology and pathophysiology of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy remain poorly understood. Hypertensive disorders are a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Treatment of hypertension decreases the incidence of severe hypertension, but it does not impact rates of preeclampsia or other pregnancy complications. Several antihypertensive medications are commonly used in pregnancy, although there is a lack of randomized controlled trials. Severe hypertension should be treated immediately to prevent maternal end-organ damage. Appropriate antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum management is important in caring for patients with hypertensive disorders.

Pentosan polysulfate preserves renal microvascular P2X1 receptor reactivity and autoregulatory behavior in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats.

Inflammation contributes to ANG II-associated impairment of renal autoregulation and microvascular P2X1 receptor signaling, but its role in renal autoregulation in mineralocorticoid-induced hypertension is unknown. Autoregulatory behavior was assessed using the blood-perfused juxtamedullary nephron preparation. Hypertension was induced in uninephrectomized control rats (UNx) by subcutaneous implantation of a DOCA pellet plus administration of 1% NaCl in the drinking water (DOCA-salt) for 3 wk. DOCA-salt rats developed hypertension that was unaltered by anti-inflammatory treatment with pentosan polysulfate (DOCA-salt+PPS) but was suppressed with "triple therapy" (hydrochlorothiazide, hydralazine, and reserpine; DOCA-salt+TTx). Baseline arteriolar diameters were similar across all groups. UNx rats exhibited pressure-dependent vasoconstriction with diameters declining to 69 ± 2% of control at 170 mmHg, indicating intact autoregulation. DOCA-salt treatment significantly blunted this pressure-mediated vasoconstriction. Diameters remained between 91 ± 4 and 98 ± 3% of control over 65-170 mmHg, indicating impaired autoregulation. In contrast, pressure-mediated vasoconstriction was preserved in DOCA-salt+PPS and DOCA-salt+TTx rats, reaching 77 ± 7 and 75 ± 3% of control at 170 mmHg, respectively. ATP is required for autoregulation via P2X1 receptor activation. ATP- and ß,γ-methylene ATP (P2X1 receptor agonist)-mediated vasoconstriction were markedly attenuated in DOCA-salt rats compared with UNx (P < 0.05), but significantly improved by PPS or TTx (P < 0.05 vs. DOCA-salt) treatment. Arteriolar responses to adenosine and UTP (P2Y2 receptor agonist) were unaffected by DOCA-salt treatment. PPS and TTx significantly reduced MCP-1 and protein excretion in DOCA-salt rats. These results support the hypothesis that hypertension triggers inflammatory cascades but anti-inflammatory treatment preserves renal autoregulation in DOCA-salt rats, most likely by normalizing renal microvascular reactivity to P2X1 receptor activation.

Effect of hydralazine on duration of soft tissue local anesthesia following dental treatment: a randomized clinical trial.

Prolonged numbness following routine dental treatments can cause difficulties in speaking and swallowing and may result in inadvertent biting of soft tissues. Local injection of vasodilator agents may represent a solution to this problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of submucosal injection of hydralazine hydrochloride (HCl) on the duration of oral soft tissue anesthesia after routine dental treatment. This randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial included 50 patients who received inferior alveolar nerve block (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) for simple restorative treatment. Upon completion of the dental treatment, patients randomly received a hydralazine HCl or sham injection in the same site as the local anesthetic injection. The reversal time to normal sensation of soft tissues (lips, tongue, and perioral skin) was evaluated and reported every 5 minutes by the patients, who followed an assessment protocol that they were taught in advance of treatment. Median recovery times in the hydralazine group and the sham group were 81.4 (SD, 3.6) and 221.8 (SD, 6.3) minutes, respectively. Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the duration of soft tissue anesthesia in the 2 groups was significantly different (P < 0.0001). By 1 hour after the reversal injection, 76% of subjects receiving hydralazine HCl had returned to normal intraoral and perioral sensation, but none of the subjects in the sham group reported normal sensation. Based on these results, submucosal injection of hydralazine HCl can be considered a safe and effective method to reduce the duration of local anesthetic-induced soft tissue numbness and the related functional problems.

Hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicate 7% to 10% of pregnancies and are among the major causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Recently American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Taskforce on Hypertension during Pregnancy modified the diagnosis and management of hypertension in pregnancy, recommending prompt diagnosis, admission, close monitoring, and treatment. They strive to decrease maternal mortality and systemic complications. Labetalol, hydralazine, or nifedipine are considered first-line treatment, and either can be used to stabilize the patient with similar outcomes. Definite treatment is delivery of the fetus and should be considered based on the etiology of the hypertensive crisis and gestational age.

Severe pre-eclampsia and hypertensive crises.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are one of the leading causes of peripartum morbidity and mortality globally. Hypertensive disease in pregnancy is associated with a spectrum of severity, ranging from mild pregnancy-induced hypertension to eclampsia. Although most cases of pre-eclampsia may be managed successfully, severe pre-eclampsia is a life-threatening multisystem disease associated with eclampsia, HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome, acute kidney injury, pulmonary oedema, placental abruption and intrauterine foetal death. Management of severe pre-eclampsia includes identification of high-risk patients, optimisation of antenatal care, early intervention and the identification and early management of complications. In the first instance, oral anti-hypertensive agents, including labetalol, nifedipine and methyldopa, should be tried. If oral anti-hypertensive agents have failed to adequately control blood pressure, intravenous anti-hypertensives should be considered. Commonly used intravenous anti-hypertensives include labetalol, hydralazine and glyceryl trinitrate. In addition to anti-hypertensive agents, close attention should be given to regular clinical examination, assessment of fluid balance, neurologic status and monitoring of other vital signs. Magnesium sulphate should be considered early to prevent seizures. Delivery of the baby is the definitive management of severe pre-eclampsia.

Hypertensive emergencies of pregnancy.

Hypertension is commonly encountered in pregnancy and has both maternal and fetal effects. Acute hypertensive crisis most commonly occurs in severe preeclampsia and is associated with maternal stroke, cardiopulmonary decompensation, fetal decompensation due to decreased uterine perfusion, abruption, and stillbirth. Immediate stabilization of the mother including the use of intervenous antihypertensives is required and often delivery is indicated. With appropriate management, maternal and fetal outcomes can be excellent.

[Clinical efficacy and perinatal outcome of nifedipine for severe preeclampsia: meta-analysis].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, side effects and perinatal outcome of nifedipine compared with other antihypertensives for treating severe preeclampsia in pregnant women. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that comparing nifedipine with other antihypertensives for severe preeclampsia were searched in PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane library, CNKI and VIP database etc(till January 2012). The quality of the included RCTs was evaluated, and Meta-analysis was performed with Rev Man 5.1 software. RESULTS: Nine trials were included, involving 386 women in the nifedipine group, and 378 women in other antihypertensives group. Compared with other antihypertensives, nifidepine was associated with greater effective control of blood pressure (OR = 2.65, 95%CI: 1.65 - 4.25, P < 0.01). There was no clear difference in the time needed to control blood pressure (WMD = -3.64, 95%CI: -10.90 - 3.61, P = 0.32). Nifedipine could prolong gestation better than other antihypertensives (WMD = 5.14, 95%CI: 3.29 - 6.99, P < 0.01). There were no clear differences in maternal side effects headache (P = 0.28), palpitation (P = 0.06), and nausea vomiting (P = 0.28). No noticeable difference was found between the two groups in the Apgar score at five minutes (WMD = -0.21, 95%CI: -0.32 - 0.91, P = 0.72), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (OR = 1.24, 95%CI: 0.57 - 2.67, P = 0.59), or perinatal deaths (OR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.22 - 1.11, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Nifedipine is associated with greater effective control of blood pressure and prolongation of gestation, with no additional neonatal respiratory distress syndrome or perinatal deaths, compared with other antihypertensives for women with severe preeclampsia.

Comparison of the efficacy of nifedipine and hydralazine in hypertensive crisis in pregnancy.

Intravenous hydralazine is a commonly administered arteriolar vasodilator that is effective for hypertensive emergencies associated with pregnancy. Oral nifedipine is an alternative in management of these patients. In this study the efficacy of nifedipine and hydralazine in pregnancy was compared in a group of Iranian patients. Fifty hypertensive pregnant women were enrolled in the study. A randomized clinical trial was performed, in which patients in two groups received intravenus hydralazine or oral nifedipine to achieve target blood pressure reduction. The primary outcomes measured were the time and doses required for desired blood pressure achievement. Secondary measures included urinary output and maternal and neonatal side effects. The time required for reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was shorter for oral nifedipine group (24.0 ± 10.0 min) than intravenus Hydralazine group (34.8 ± 18.8 min) (P ≤ 0.016). Less frequent doses were required with oral nifedipine (1.2 ± 0.5) compared to intravenus hydralazine (2.1 ± 1.0) (P ≤ 0.0005). There were no episodes of hypotension after hydralazine and one after nifedipine. Nifedipine and hydralazine are safe and effective antihypertensive drugs, showing a controlled and comparable blood pressure reduction in women with hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy. Both drugs reduce episodes of persistent severe hypertension. Considering pharmacokinetic properties of nifedipine such as rapid onset and long duration of action, the good oral bioavailability and less frequent side effects, it looks more preferable in hypertension emergencies of pregnancy than hydralazine.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of preeclampsia.

PURPOSE: Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of preeclampsia are reviewed. SUMMARY: Risk factors for the development of preeclampsia include microvascular diseases, such as diabetes mellitus; vascular and connective tissue disorders; hypertension; antiphospholipid antibody syndrome; and nephropathy. Several pathophysiological factors contribute to the development of the preeclamptic state, including vasospasm onset, coagulation system activation, increased inflammatory response, and ischemia. The specific agents used for the treatment of preeclampsia are dependent on a number of factors including symptom severity, maternal or fetal compromise, the progression to eclampsia, gestational period, and cervical status. The diagnosis of preeclampsia beyond the gestation period of 38 weeks requires delivery. The presence of maternal compromise or eclampsia at gestation greater than 20 weeks also necessitates delivery. In cases of chronic or mild hypertension, oral methyldopa may be administered on an outpatient basis. Intravenous hydralazine is a commonly administered arteriolar vasodilator that is effective for hypertensive emergencies associated with pregnancies. The most common adverse effect of hydralazine administration is unpredictable hypotension. Labetalol decreases heart rate and may be preferred because of a lack of reflex tachycardia, hypotension, or increased intracranial pressure. However, the drug of choice for the prevention and control of maternal seizures in patients with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia during the peripartum period is i.v. magnesium sulfate. Therapeutic serum magnesium levels cause cerebral vasodilation, thereby reversing the ischemia produced by cerebral vasospasm during an eclamptic episode. The results of one study indicated that women receiving magnesium sulfate therapy had a 58% lower risk of eclampsia than placebo. CONCLUSION: Magnesium sulfate remains the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of preeclampsia. Alternative antihypertensive agents may provide additional benefit in the management of hypertension for preeclamptic patients.